Human-supervised assistance

Artificial Intelligence Use Policy

This policy defines allowed uses, prohibited data, human oversight, transparency, provider governance, and challenge routes for material outputs.

Published and effective as an operational document, without claiming external legal review

This is a public operational text. It does not replace a project contract, a product-specific privacy notice, or legal review based on the organization and its actual service providers.

Document code
POL-PUB-AI-001
Version
1.0.0
Effective date
Content review
Next review
Owner
Governance and privacy
Authoritative version
Arabic. If translations differ, the Arabic text prevails, subject to applicable law and contract.
Contact channel
studio@cupcodestudio.com
Scope

Public website, accounts, and connected digital services

Audience

Visitors, users, and clients

Jurisdiction

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, subject to other mandatory laws where applicable

Operational publication authority

Cup Code operational publication catalog

Document summary

This policy defines allowed uses, prohibited data, human oversight, transparency, provider governance, and challenge routes for material outputs.

Uses

AI tools may summarize text, suggest drafts, classify requests, detect similarity, translate, search authorized knowledge, or analyze aggregated data. Output is presented as assistance, not an approved fact.

Data not sent

Passwords, keys, session tokens, payroll data, full payment data, and highly restricted files must not be sent. Identity and unnecessary information are removed before sending where the purpose allows.

Provider selection

The system uses a provider-neutral layer. Each provider is reviewed for processing location, training use, retention, security, subprocessors, cost, and exit plan. Keys are not displayed after saving.

Human review

External replies, contracts, policies, official decisions, permanent bans, and material decisions require authorized human approval. The system does not reject a suggestion, delete a user, or change a vote result based only on a model.

Accuracy and testing

Prompts and models are tested for correct and incorrect cases, bias, safety, and privacy before activation. Staff review retrieved sources and verify claims before approval.

Transparency

Users are told when they interact with an automated assistant or material content was AI-assisted, including limits and a route to a person. The assistant does not impersonate a real employee.

Logs and retention

Use, user, module, provider, model, prompt, version, cost, and outcome are logged with sensitive content redacted. Input and output retention follows purpose and is not indefinite by default.

Challenge and correction

A user may request human review of an output affecting a ticket, content, or access. We correct the record and update the prompt or control for recurring errors. A user appeal is not used for external training without a basis.

Knowledge sources and permissions

The assistant does not retrieve a document the user lacks permission to view. Used sources are shown, permission is enforced before and after embedding, and access withdrawal removes the source from the index.

Official references

References used to prepare this content

Links point to official legal or guidance sources. Applicability depends on the organization, product, and contract.

Versions

Change log

  1. Version 1.0.0

    Published the first operational version with clear scope, responsibilities, rights, and escalation routes.